5.4 KiB
tracker_id, key, type, title, parent, covers, after, assignee, risk
| tracker_id | key | type | title | parent | covers | after | assignee | risk | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| initiative | [The outcome this container exists to reach] | none |
|
|
[Title]
Description
[What is true when this is done and why it matters. With a spec, one paragraph pointing at it; without one, the intent in full.]
Outcome
[One sentence: for whom, what changes, and the signal that shows it worked — the spec's, named not restated, when there is one.]
Requirements
[The requirement source at this altitude: the source's lines as stable ids for children to cite, each mapping to a source id in covers. A referenced numbered source replaces it; a separate spec only when the source outgrows this section.]
Done when
[Three to six checks the owner runs at the end, taken from the source's measures and limits. Closing every child is not one.]
Boundaries
[Which boundary this container follows — team, service, UI, capability — and what it is not. Point at the spec's non-goals when there is one. Then one line per unit the work touches that gets no epic, and the tracer path across epics in one sentence.]
- Touch point: [unit] — [what is consumed or configured there]; owner: epic-[slug]
References
[type — location, section. The spec at this level when one exists (its references are followed from there); otherwise what this was split from.]
- spec — [path from {project-root}, or url for a remote source; section Capabilities]
- constraint — [the source section that binds this container: privacy, platform, licensing, performance]
- [an input the spec does not carry — location, section]
Notes
[What is not settled at this level. Cut if empty.]
- Assumption: [a choice made while slicing that the user has not confirmed]
- Open question: [what the source does not settle and which children wait on it]
- Unknown: [what is not yet known and which entries wait on it, recorded now so it is not found late]
- Parked: [a requirement id not placed on any child, and why, with the user's knowledge]
- Decision: [a choice the user made, dated, so it is not asked again — a declined suggestion belongs here too]
- Source conflict: [id or section — what the source says vs what the code or another source shows]
- Waits on [epic] because: [the one-line reason for each entry in after]
---
type: initiative
title: "Checkout that shoppers finish"
parent: none
covers: [C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, P1, P2, T1]
assignee: ""
risk: high
---
# Checkout that shoppers finish
## Description
Shoppers go from cart to paid order in one pass, with the price they saw, on any supported device or as a guest. The spec owns the capabilities, constraints, and non-goals; this initiative delivers them for the fall release.
## Outcome
The Q4 revenue target depends on lifting cart-to-payment completion from 55% to 70%; this initiative owns that number, the spec's success signal, measured over a full quarter.
## Done when
1. Cart-to-payment completion holds at the spec's target for one full quarter after release.
2. Every capability in C1–C6, P1–P2, and T1 is live for all shoppers, not behind a flag.
3. Refund and chargeback rates are no worse than the quarter before release.
4. No P0 or P1 checkout bug open for more than a day during the first month.
## Boundaries
The web store's checkout flow, the payment-provider integration, and guest checkout across web and mobile. Not the order-management backend beyond the order it creates, not loyalty, not the catalog; see the spec's non-goals. Tracer path: one catalog item priced, carted, taxed, and paid by a signed-in shopper.
- Touch point: notification service — a new order-confirmation template, no code change; owner: epic-tax-and-payment
## References
- spec — _bmad-output/initiative-checkout/spec-checkout/spec-checkout.md
- constraint — the same spec, section Constraints, PCI scope and response time
- prd — _bmad-output/initiative-checkout/prd-checkout/prd-checkout.md, for history only
## Notes
- Parked: gift cards (C7); not in the fall release, user's call 2026-08-12.
- Decision: one payment provider for v1, replacing the current one (user's decision, 2026-08-12).
- Unknown: whether the tax service can meet the response-time constraint at peak; epic Tax and payment owns the answer.